Hillary for Pres
I may have changed my mind. Hmmmmmm..................
http://www.fredoneverything.net/WriteInHillary.shtml
I kind of like it. Sort of a 'None of the above'.
<=========================================================>
Incoherent ramblings of an overworked computer geek who rarely has the sense to keep his mouth shut!
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
The fundamental question is simply this. Why would a consumer want to buy something that has more restrictions and less functionality for more money than current solutions? I have asked this question to junior members of the companies to the very top CxOs, and from people on the street to fellow journalists. No-one can give me an answer.
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
News Story by Dan Verton
![]()
OCTOBER 18, 2004(COMPUTERWORLD) - This November, as many as 50 million Americans could vote for president using some form of electronic touch-screen system, the vast majority of which have been designed by McKinney, Texas-based Diebold Election Systems. That has some IT and security researchers holding their breath because of the faulty track record of Diebold's technology and a government-endorsed testing and certification process that they say is deeply flawed.
<=========================================================>
Rather than soften Bush's appeal to reach moderates, Rove, as he has done throughout his career, is attempting to control the debate by expertly spotlighting issues sure to inspire his core constituency: the drive for a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, the pronouncements about love of country, the unremitting attack against anything in an opponent that seems impregnable. All these tactics stand out in Rove's most memorable past victories.
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
If you are part of a society that votes, then do so. There may be no candidates and no measures you want to vote for ... but there are certain to be ones you want to vote against. By this rule you will rarely go wrong.--in "The Notebooks of Lazarus Long," in his masterpiece Time Enough For Love.
<=========================================================>
What to do on election day? Good lord, what a pickle.
Do I vote for Kerry as a way of punishing the Republicans for their arrogance and idiocies? What does it take for them to understand that they should be the party of modest government? But a protest vote against Bush would almost certainly be interpreted as a vote for Kerry, and I'd hate to give anyone the impression I'm sanctioning that zero. God only knows what he stands for anyway ...
But maybe a Kerry presidency wouldn't be the worst thing imaginable. The combo of Democratic president and Republican legislature often creates gridlock, and gridlock seems to be the only way that brakes get applied to runaway government these days. Still, that's a risky strategy. What if differences get ironed out and laws get passed? Wouldn't want that ...
snip........
http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/001691.html#001691
The more you can get politicians to do less the better -
Power to the Gridlock!
<=========================================================>
The “focus groups” on TV are a fun, yet depressing, thing to see. Featured are “undecided voters” from all walks of life. They are shown clips of the candidates on a monitor and then vomit out their thoughts…
“I don’t know. Kerry’s hair was a bit out of place. He licks his tongue a lot too. I’m concerned how this might come into play during cabinet meetings. Will he have the respect of his Secretaries? On the other hand, Bush...”
“Well… I liked what Kerry said. But… I also liked what Bush said. They both talk so well. I just don’t know.”
I even heard one of them say, “If only we could blend the two of them together…”
Good Lord!
I say… JUST MAKE UP YOUR STUPID MIND YOU IDIOT!!!!!
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>
"The recording industry (proposals) would effectively put at risk all consumer electronics, information technology products, and Internet products and services that aren't designed to the industry's liking," read one letter sent Wednesday and signed by lobby groups representing technology companies, including News.com publisher CNET Networks. "We urge you not to move forward now."
Last Sunday Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer kicked off this week's European tour by sitting down with a small group* of British journalists and dispensing pearls of wisdom, notably on the future of Apple in home networking (it has none, natch, says Steve). He also did at least one interview, with the Financial Times (published in Tuesday's paper), remarkable largely because it inadvertently revealed the Microsoft High Command's paucity of ideas - if this is all Steve's currently betting the company on, then Microsoft is in big trouble.
But the Apple stuff, particularly the ill-informed 'iPod users are thieves' slur, is worth examining in some detail, because it shows that Steve doesn't Get It, that Microsoft doesn't Get It, and points us to the reasons why they don't Get It. Microsoft, essentially, is pre-programmed to fail in the battle for the home, for consumer electronics, and for consumer digital services.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/07/ballmer_doesnt_get_it/
Also if you have lots of time read Andrew Orlowski's article on what the music industry might consider doing instead
<=========================================================>
<=========================================================>